
Recently, some pretty responsible cultural critics have been suggesting that attempts to create social and political change in this country must move from the traditional channels of legal petitioning and protesting to illegal civil disobedience.
“The phrase consent of the governed has been turned into a cruel joke. There is no way to vote against the interests of Goldman Sachs. Civil disobedience is the only tool we have left.” --Chris Hedges
“Our last hope is to generate a democratic awakening among our fellow citizens. This means raising our voices, very loud and strong, bearing witness, individually and collectively. Tavis [Smiley] and I have talked about ways of civil disobedience, beginning with ways for both of us to get arrested…” --Dr. Cornel West
First of all, such awakening of the somnolent masses requires a great many voices and an even greater number of listeners. During the civil rights marches, a small number of courageous, dedicated people were, thanks to the national press, able to capture the conscience of the nation and even able to force our national leaders to reluctantly take action. The same can be said of the protests that finally helped end the Vietnam War.
Today, I despair of ever rousing more than a small percentage of our infotainment besotted citizens. Most Americans are dumb as Fox’s viewers as to the causes of their disenfranchisement. They would rather take their frustrations out on spouses and their children than ever awakening and raising a voice—even in protest. Pry the remotes only from their cold, dead hands.
In the past, I have supported and been involved in civil disobedience. That was when we still had laws that protected law breakers—even principled law breakers. I would never involve myself in any public activity that would risk arrest or even temporary incarceration. To do so would be to invite violence and criminality on the part of law enforcement agents, many of whom no longer use violence as an exception. This goes double when the canard of Fatherland Security is trotted out, as it is in so many cases relating to political dissent. So where does that leave us? To quote one notorious fire-breathing radical,
“Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.” -- John Fitzgerald Kennedy.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Other articles in Politics
Questions NATO summit did not tackle 23 May 2012
History Repeats Itself in Honduran Drug-War Killings 23 May 2012
Anwar's legal battles with his political foes 23 May 2012
NO NO NATO 21 May 2012
Why An Ex-Marine Turns Pacifist 21 May 2012
Jeff Blankfort to AZZ Gabriel Ash 20 May 2012
And Lukewarm Was His Name-O 19 May 2012
Chicago Militarized for NATO 19 May 2012
A 'victory' for hunger strikers? 19 May 2012
Ziyad Yaghi: Guilty of Being Muslim in America 18 May 2012
Featured_Author
Opinion
|
Is Jeffrey Feltman Iran’s Best Friend in Lebanon? |
| Franklin Lamb | |
|
Staying Sober |
| Lawrence Davidson | |
|
NO NO NATO |
| Bob Boldt | |
|
Jerusalem Day |
| Stephen Lendman | |
|
Why An Ex-Marine Turns Pacifist |
| Sherwood Ross | |
|
Hafez Aladdeen is an Israeli Patriot |
| Gilad Atzmon | |
|
Ongoing Palestinian Genocide |
| Gideon Polya | |
|
Is the Occupy Movement Justified? |
| Timothy V. Gatto | |
|
And Lukewarm Was His Name-O |
| Will Durst | |
|
The New Protest |
| Uri Avnery | |
|
That Was Now, This is Then |
| Nima Shirazi | |













