
by Jacob G. Hornberger
The Washington Post yesterday profiled a Pakistani man named Hamid Gul, who served as head of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency from 1987 to 1989. The article pointed out that Gul is viewed by U.S. officials as a terrorist, one who has been helping the Taliban oust U.S. forces from Afghanistan.
What makes the story interesting, however, is that it wasn’t always that way. Gul used to be a freedom fighter and a close friend and ally of the U.S. government.
What happened?
Back when it was the Soviet Union that was the foreign occupier of Afghanistan, Gul and the U.S. government were working together to end the Soviet occupation. As the Post points out, Gul “helped the CIA funnel Islamist fighters to fight the Soviets.” In fact, it was during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan that Osama bin Laden came into Afghanistan and made a name for himself as a freedom fighter.
According to the Post, Gul “readily acknowledged that he has maintained friendships with former mujaheddin such as Jalaluddin Haqqani, a onetime CIA-backed fighter whose network is now viewed as the coalition forces’ most lethal foe. ‘The Americans dropped him like a hot brick,’ Gul said. ‘Why should I drop him just because he is doing the same thing … that they did against the Soviet occupation? They are fighting for the liberation of their country.’”
The same Gul who was viewed by U.S. officials as a “pro-Western and moderate” freedom fighter is now viewed by the U.S. government as a “murderous terrorist agent.”
What accounts for the change in perspective? Before, Gul was helping the Afghans bring an end to the Soviet occupation of their country. That made him a freedom fighter. Now, however, Gul is helping the Afghanis bring an end to the U.S. occupation of their country, and that makes him a terrorist.
For his part, Gul maintains that his actions have been entirely consistent the entire time — helping the Afghanis end the foreign occupation of their country.
Which one is it? Is Gul a freedom fighter or a terrorist? The answer would seem to turn on who is doing the occupying and who is doing the labeling. As the old saying goes, one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter.
Jacob Hornberger is founder and president of The Future of Freedom Foundation.
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Other articles in Politics
The New War of the Christian Crusaders 17 August 2010
COIN Thinking on a Larger Scale Might Work 17 August 2010
Why the US Empire Will Never Conquer Afghanistan 17 August 2010
Wake Up Obama 16 August 2010
Interventionism and the Arizona Immigration Crisis 13 August 2010
Omar Khadr's Guantanamo trial 12 August 2010
The Cycle of Violence in Afghanistan 10 August 2010
Rachel Maddow Misses Journalistic Opportunity 10 August 2010
No Right to Counsel in the War on Terrorism 09 August 2010
The most controversial trial at Guantanamo 09 August 2010
Featured_Author
Opinion
|
Why Did Palestinian Refugees Come to Lebanon? |
| Franklin Lamb | |
|
Obama Can Stop Israel from Attacking Iran |
| Sheldon Richman | |
|
Iran: A Manufactured Threat |
| Stephen Lendman | |
|
Yet another War for Israel |
| William A. Cook | |
|
Two Front International Struggle For Palestine |
| Lawrence Davidson | |
|
City on the Hill? |
| William deB. Mills | |
|
Is America a Police State? |
| Sherwood Ross | |
|
Send in the Clowns… |
| Bob Boldt | |
|
Genocidal Dayton Constitution! |
| Francis Boyle | |
|
The GOP Soap Opera |
| Will Durst | |
|
Caterpillar: Symptoms of Social Cancer |
| Archie Kennedy | |
|
The American Dilemma |
| Gilad Atzmon | |












