By Agencies

Share Link:

The UN and human rights groups have condemned a Haitian court's decision not to charge Jean-Claude "Baby Doc" Duvalier, the country former dictator, over allegations of torture and murder.

Duvalier will face trial for corruption during his 15-year rule, but not for human rights abuses, Carves Jean, the judge handling the case, said on Monday.
 
"I did not find enough legal grounds to keep human rights charges and crimes against humanity against him," he said. "Now my job is over. The case is no longer in my hands."
 
The judge said that the decision, based on a year-long investigation, must first be reviewed by the attorney general as well as by Duvalier and the victims of his regime who filed complaints against the former leader.
 
Rupert Colville, a spokesman for the UN's High Commissioner for Human Rights, said Duvalier must be tried for "very serious human rights violations" during his 15-year reign that were "extensively documented."
 
He said the UN is "extremely disappointed" by Investigative Magistrate Carves Jean's decision Monday to recommend that the ruler once known as "Baby Doc" face trial only on corruption charges.
 
Reed Brody, a counsel for Human Rights Watch, wrote in an e-mail: "Those who were tortured under Duvalier, those whose loved ones were killed or simply disappeared, deserve better than this."
 
Amnesty International researcher Gerardo Ducos said he was puzzled by the judge's findings, saying the "investigation was a sham and its conclusion a disgrace".
 
Critical testimony 'ignored'
 
Rights groups said the judge ignored critical testimony that would have given weight to a prosecution of the once-feared ruler known as "Baby Doc" for crimes that include torture, false imprisonment and murder.
 
Mario Joseph, a lawyer whose Haitian-run firm is representing some of the Duvalier regime's victims, said the judge "made so many errors" that they had compromised his pre-trial investigation.

Duvalier's lawyer, Reynold Georges, had argued that all charges should be dismissed, and he said he would appeal Jean's finding as soon as he received the paperwork.
 
He said the former dictator would appeal any decision to put him on trial for financial crimes, arguing that the supreme court had already cleared him of such charges following a previous investigation.
 
Brian Concannon of the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti told Al Jazeera: "The arguments that Duvalier’s lawyers have been making is that crime against humanity doesn’t apply because there is no such thing as crime against humanity in Haitian legal code.
 
"But it is a pretty clear consensus that under international law the statute limitations do not apply to crimes against humanity.
 
"But courts have looked at it in other countries, including international courts that are binding on Haiti, and they have said, you don’t need the words "crime against humanity,'" he said.
 
"Crime against humanity can be murder, it can be torture as long as it fits certain requirements that fit here, and is clearly applicable to Duvalier case."
 
'Outrageous decision'
 
Duvalier inherited power from his father, Francois 'Papa Doc' Duvalier in 1971 and ruled Haiti for 15 years until his overthrow in 1986.
 
Under the father-and-son dictatorship, thousands of people were murdered, or were tortured in jails, such as the dreaded Fort Dimanche prison.
 
Duvalier, now 60, made a surprise return to his earthquake-stricken homeland in January last year after nearly 25 years exiled in France, opening himself up to possible prosecution.
 
More than 20 victims filed complaints shortly after Duvalier's return, among them prominent Haitians such as Robert Duval, a former footballer who said he was beaten and starved during his 17 months of captivity in Fort Dimanche.
 
On Monday, Duval said he was stunned when he was notified about the judge's decision.
 
"I don't understand how he could've done that,'' Duval said by telephone. "If that's the case, that's an outrageous decision."
 
Haitian President Michel Martelly had given mixed signals about the case, last week recanting a suggestion from a day earlier that he might be open to a possible pardon for Duvalier, citing a need to end internal strife that has long dogged the country.